Oppression / Freeze-out

Am I Oppressed?

A Minority Shareholder’s / Business Owner’s Diagnosis

In businesses and corporations (of all sizes) across the country, the law generally requires management to act in accordance with their fiduciary duties.  A fiduciary duty requires, among other things, that management act in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation.  If a director, officer, or member of management is failing to act in accordance with these and other duties and you are harmed – you may be oppressed.hands-in-handcuffs-hold-money-1462608007hWN

Oppression or “freeze-out,” as it is commonly diagnosed, often occurs in smaller corporations where management and ownership are held by a close / small group of individuals.  In these “close corporations” the relationship amongst the owners and management must be one of trust, confidence, and absolute loyalty – all characteristics of a fiduciary relationship.  Disloyalty and self-seeking conduct, however, will often result in bickering, corporate stalemates, and possibly dissolution (terminating the company).  It is the latter of these symptoms that frequently metastasize into oppression.

Just like a sickness, the onset of one symptom is generally insufficient to diagnose a problem or oppression.  However, once the symptoms spread and multiply oppression can set in.  Oppression has been found to occur when management:

1. Refuses to declare dividends;

2. Pays out exorbitant salaries and bonuses (to either themselves and/or their relatives);

3. Causes the corporation to pay high rent for property leased from the officer / director;

4. Deprives the minority owner employment in the company;

5. Causes the corporation to sell its assets at an inadequate price to majority shareholders / management;

6. Using corporate funds for personal or non-corporate use; and

7.  Disregards a shareholder’s reasonable expectations.

When a minority shareholder suffers from oppression in a close corporation they are often left without a job and an illiquid asset (their stock / ownership interest).  Routinely, shareholders in a close corporation have a substantial percentage of personal assets invested in the corporation and may rely upon a salary from the corporation for income.  Thus, once oppression sets in, a suffering shareholder cannot afford to passively wait for things to change.  The suffering shareholder is left with no option but to liquidate his/her investment in the close corporation in order to reinvest in an income-producing enterprise.

In a large public corporation, where stock is traded on an index (such as NASDAQ), an oppressed or aggrieved shareholder has a market to sell his/her stock in order to get out.  Unfortunately, however, an oppressed shareholder in a close corporation, by definition, does not have a public market to sell the shares (i.e. he/she cannot call up a broker and sell the stock).  And, not surprisingly, the very management that is causing the oppression is frequently unwilling to buy back any shares from the oppressed shareholder.   As such, an oppressed shareholder is left holding stock in a company that does not pay dividends, does not recognize the shareholder’s reasonable expectations, and will no longer provide gainful employment.

Fortunately, the law has developed cures for truly oppressed shareholders.  Remedies for oppression include forcing a buy-out at a fair price, dissolving the corporation and liquidating its assets, removing management, ordering dividends, and many others.  If you believe you may be experiencing certain symptoms of oppression, are suffering from oppression, or simply have questions on the matter you may want to consider contacting a licensed attorney.

For a 2011 Iowa Court of Appeals opinion on oppression and freeze out, click here.


Innovative Litigation, L.L.C., as owner and host of this site, and Matthew McKinney as the author (acting on behalf of and through Innovative Litigation, L.L.C.) cannot and does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information presented on or through this site.  The law can and does change over time and the information contained herein may not reflect the most recent laws – whether statutory law, administrative law, case law, constitutional law, or otherwise.  The information on this website does not constitute legal advice and readers should not rely on it to solve problems or other matters.  Further, you should seek licensed counsel in the appropriate legal jurisdiction before taking any action.  Any information provided on this site is presented “As Is” for your personal curiosity and enjoyment.  It is not meant to be relied upon for legal advice, counsel, or for any other purposes.  Such information does not take the place of a lawyer.  Rules and laws differ by jurisdiction and the information contained within this website may not apply in your jurisdiction.  The appearance of articles, listings, or ads, by or for professionals, on this site, does not constitute an endorsement.  In all cases, you are responsible for determining the quality of services, information, and/or advice provided by professionals through, or as a consequence of, your use of this site.  Neither liability nor responsibility shall arise to any person or entity with respect to loss or damage caused (or alleged to be caused), directly or indirectly, by information posted on this website, or by reason of contact with a professional listed on, or posting information to, this site.  No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this website and practice is limited to jurisdiction where lawyers are admitted.  The information furnished on the website is only general and not a substitute for personalized legal advice.   Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to the individual(s) situation.  Laws can change daily and new laws may, and likely will, affect the accuracy of the information herein.  The information herein may be outdated and replaced by new law.

If you are seeking representation, please read the following notice before sending an e-mail:

Sending an e-mail will not make you a client.  Until an agreement regarding representation is reached with you, anything you send will not be confidential or privileged.  Before representation can occur, a lawyer will first take you through the conflict of interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter.

If you proceed with an e-mail, you confirm that you have read and understood this notice.


About Matthew McKinney

Attorney focused on civil and commercial litigation.
This entry was posted in Business Owner, Litigation, Shareholder and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Oppression / Freeze-out

  1. Pingback: The Relief You May Seek if You Are Suffering From Shareholder Oppression | Business and Corporate Disputes

  2. Pingback: 10 Characteristics of Shareholder Oppression in an Iowa Business – The Iowa Court of Appeals Explains | Business and Corporate Disputes

  3. Pingback: Oppression, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Freeze Out, and Judicial Dissolution – An Iowa Court of Appeals 2011 Analysis | Business and Corporate Disputes

  4. Pingback: An Introduction to Fiduciary Duties in Small Businesses and Corporations | Business and Corporate Disputes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s