The Business Judgment Rule – a rule all business owners / shareholders should consider before challenging decisions made by a business’ management.
Generally speaking, decisions made by a business’ management (officers / directors; member / managers) are protected from outside interference from a court through application of the Business Judgment Rule.
The Business Judgment Rule is aimed at relieving judges – who may not have experience or knowledge about running a business – from taking a seat in the board room and effectively running the business from the bench. The Rule, which is more a less a legal fiction / theory, was created by courts and is applied when a court is asked to review a business’ decision.
Application of the Business Judgment Rule allows (or requires, depending upon your viewpoint) a court to presume that despite a challenge to a business decision(s), management acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the business. Put another way, the Court presumes the challenged action need not be reviewed or disturbed.
The party challenging management’s decision must overcome this presumption or face the likely outcome that the decision, regardless of how poor it may have been, will nonetheless stand. A person may overcome the presumption of the Business Judgment Rule in several ways. For example, a person challenging a business decision may rebut / overcome the presumption by presenting evidence that management breached its fiduciary duties of care and / or loyalty. See post on fiduciary duties. While presenting such evidence may help overcome the first hurdle – rebutting the presumption – it does not necessarily mean the challenged decision was improper, that wrongdoing occurred, or that you are entitled to relief. Rather, rebutting the presumption means the court can take the next step and actually analyze the wrongdoing / decision(s) at issue. In other words, the person challenging the decision may have won the initial battle, but the war is ahead.
If, however, a person challenging management’s decision cannot overcome / rebut the presumption, the decision (no matter how excellent or poor it is/was) will likely be upheld unless it cannot be attributed to any rational business purpose – a very high and difficult burden to overcome. In short, if the presumption cannot be overcome and management is able to present one rational business purpose, regardless of how prudent or imprudent the challenged decision was, the court will likely not interfere with or review the challenged decision.
Innovative Litigation, L.L.C., as owner and host of this site, and Matthew McKinney as the author (acting on behalf of and through Innovative Litigation, L.L.C.) cannot and does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information presented on or through this site. The law can and does change over time and the information contained herein may not reflect the most recent laws – whether statutory law, administrative law, case law, constitutional law, or otherwise. The information on this website does not constitute legal advice and readers should not rely on it to solve problems or other matters. Further, you should seek licensed counsel in the appropriate legal jurisdiction before taking any action. Any information provided on this site is presented “As Is” for your personal curiosity and enjoyment. It is not meant to be relied upon for legal advice, counsel, or for any other purposes. Such information does not take the place of a lawyer. Rules and laws differ by jurisdiction and the information contained within this website may not apply in your jurisdiction. The appearance of articles, listings, or ads, by or for professionals, on this site, does not constitute an endorsement. In all cases, you are responsible for determining the quality of services, information, and/or advice provided by professionals through, or as a consequence of, your use of this site. Neither liability nor responsibility shall arise to any person or entity with respect to loss or damage caused (or alleged to be caused), directly or indirectly, by information posted on this website, or by reason of contact with a professional listed on, or posting information to, this site. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this website and practice is limited to jurisdiction where lawyers are admitted. The information furnished on the website is only general and not a substitute for personalized legal advice. Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to the individual(s) situation. Laws can change daily and new laws may, and likely will, affect the accuracy of the information herein. The information herein may be outdated and replaced by new law.
If you are seeking representation, please read the following notice before sending an e-mail:
Sending an e-mail will not make you a client. Until an agreement regarding representation is reached with you, anything you send will not be confidential or privileged. Before representation can occur, a lawyer will first take you through the conflict of interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter.
If you proceed with an e-mail, you confirm that you have read and understood this notice.