10 Characteristics of Shareholder Oppression in an Iowa Business – The Iowa Court of Appeals Explains

       In Heidecker Farms, Inc. v. Heidecker, the Iowa Court of Appeals identified several different actions / inactions that may arise to shareholder oppression in Iowa.  The court began by explaining shareholder oppression generally, stating: “Oppressive conduct ‘is an expansive term used to cover a multitude of situations dealing with improper conduct which is neither illegal nor fraudulent.'”  The court then identified / referenced ten (10) different characteristics of shareholder oppression in Iowa:

      • Majority shareholders terminate a minority shareholder’s employment;
      • Majority shareholders deprive minority shareholders of corporate offices;
      • Majority shareholders prohibit a minority shareholder from otherwise participating in the business;
      • Majority shareholders refuse to declare dividends, but provide themselves with high compensation (including bonuses), leaving minority shareholders who do not hold corporate office little or no return on their investment;
      • Failing to maintain proper and accurate books and records;
      • Commingling a director or majority shareholder’s assets with those of the corporation;
      • Diverting the corporation’s assets into the director or majority shareholder’s own business operation(s);
      • Establishing a competing business;
      • Failing to provide minority shareholders with proper notice of board meetings; and
      • Causing the corporation to sell its assets at an inadequate price to majority shareholders.

           Generally, courts analyze challenged conduct in the aggregate and look to the totality of the circumstances to determine whether shareholder oppression is or has occurred.  If you are curious about whether certain conduct qualifies as shareholder oppression, or if you are concerned about whether you are being oppressed, an attorney with experience in this area of the law should be able to provide guidance based upon the unique facts of your case.  To read more about shareholder oppression click here.


Innovative Litigation, L.L.C., as owner and host of this site, and Matthew McKinney as the author (acting on behalf of and through Innovative Litigation, L.L.C.) cannot and does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information presented on or through this site.  The law can and does change over time and the information contained herein may not reflect the most recent laws – whether statutory law, administrative law, case law, constitutional law, or otherwise.  The information on this website does not constitute legal advice and readers should not rely on it to solve problems or other matters.  Further, you should seek licensed counsel in the appropriate legal jurisdiction before taking any action.  Any information provided on this site is presented “As Is” for your personal curiosity and enjoyment.  It is not meant to be relied upon for legal advice, counsel, or for any other purposes.  Such information does not take the place of a lawyer.  Rules and laws differ by jurisdiction and the information contained within this website may not apply in your jurisdiction.  The appearance of articles, listings, or ads, by or for professionals, on this site, does not constitute an endorsement.  In all cases, you are responsible for determining the quality of services, information, and/or advice provided by professionals through, or as a consequence of, your use of this site.  Neither liability nor responsibility shall arise to any person or entity with respect to loss or damage caused (or alleged to be caused), directly or indirectly, by information posted on this website, or by reason of contact with a professional listed on, or posting information to, this site.  No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this website and practice is limited to jurisdiction where lawyers are admitted.  The information furnished on the website is only general and not a substitute for personalized legal advice.   Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to the individual(s) situation.  Laws can change daily and new laws may, and likely will, affect the accuracy of the information herein.  The information herein may be outdated and replaced by new law.

If you are seeking representation, please read the following notice before sending an e-mail:

Sending an e-mail will not make you a client.  Until an agreement regarding representation is reached with you, anything you send will not be confidential or privileged.  Before representation can occur, a lawyer will first take you through the conflict of interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter.

If you proceed with an e-mail, you confirm that you have read and understood this notice.


About Matthew McKinney

Attorney focused on civil and commercial litigation.
This entry was posted in Business Owner, Director, Intra-corporate dispute, Litigation, Officer, Partners, Partnership and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to 10 Characteristics of Shareholder Oppression in an Iowa Business – The Iowa Court of Appeals Explains

  1. BAGUMA HASSAN says:

    its great

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s