Iowa Limited Liability Companies – Iowa’s Statutory Limitation on Piercing the Corporate Veil of an Iowa LLC

Members and managers of Iowa limited liability companies (LLCs) are generally protected from incurring personal liability for the act(s) and/or omission(s) of the LLC.  Indeed, Iowa Code Section 489.304 identifies some of the protections afforded to members and managers of an Iowa LLC:

1.  For debts, obligations, or other liabilities of a limited liability company, whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise all of the following apply:

a.  They are solely the debts, obligations, or other liabilities of the company.

b. They do not become the debts, obligations, or other liabilities of a member or manager solely by reason of the member acting as a member or manager acting as a manager.

Despite the language reproduced above, litigants will often attempt to “pierce the corporate veil,” which generally means:  hold members and/or managers of an LLC personally liable for certain act(s) and/or omission(s).  Iowa’s appellate courts have touched upon the legal theory of “piercing the corporate veil” in many cases.  For example:  See Cemen Tech v. Three D Industries, L.L.C., 753 NW 2d. 1 (Iowa 2008).  Litigants often attempt to pierce the corporate veil and hold members and/or managers personally liable by arguing corporate formalities are or have been disregarded.  Iowa’s Limited Liability Company Act, however, addresses this issue and restricts Iowa courts from piercing the corporate veil in certain circumstances, which may come as a surprise to many.

Iowa Code Section 489.304(2) limits an Iowa court’s ability to pierce the corporate veil, stating in part:

The failure of a limited liability company to observe any particular formalities relating to the exercise of its powers or management of its activities is not a ground for imposing liability on the members or managers for the debts, obligations, or other liabilities of the company.

The language reproduced above was adopted in approximately 2008 and is relatively new in Iowa and several other jurisdictions.  As of the date this article was published, Iowa’s appellate courts have yet to opine on the scope of protection afforded under Iowa Code Section 489.304(2).  (UPDATE:  See Post Re: Iowa Court of Appeals Opinion From January 9, 2014 Here). At least one court, however, has recognized such language will likely effect a litigant’s ability to pierce the corporate veil.  See In re Wheeler, 444 B.R. 598, 608 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2011) (citing language identical to section 489.304(2) and stating, “[a]lthough the factors considered in corporate veil piercing cases can be applied in the LLC context, those factors may apply with different weight.”).

While Iowa’s courts have yet to opine on the issue, comments to the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (RULLCA) provide some guidance.  Comments to RULLCA  state that while a failure to observe formalities is well established as a ground for piercing the veil of a corporation, it is not appropriate for an LLC, “because informality of organization and operating is both common and desired.”

Iowa Code Section 489.304 seems to answer some questions, but creates others.  For example, section 489.304(2) is narrowly tailored to protect an LLC’s corporate actions: “[t]he failure of a limited liability company to observe…”  However, what about the independent act(s) of the LLC’s individual members and/or managers – do the protections afforded under Section 489.304(2) apply if a member and/or manager fails to individually observe corporate formalities?  One can make arguments either way and a licensed attorney should be able to provide guidance on such issues.

It is also important to note that Iowa Code Section 489.304 does not address several other well-recognized justifications for veil piercing, including: undercapitalization, alter ego, and fraud.  Because Iowa Code Section 489.304 does not address such issues, strong arguments exists that Iowa courts may use such factors to pierce the veil of an Iowa LLC.


Innovative Litigation, L.L.C., as owner and host of this site, and Matthew McKinney as the author (acting on behalf of and through Innovative Litigation, L.L.C.) cannot and does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information presented on or through this site.  The law can and does change over time and the information contained herein may not reflect the most recent laws – whether statutory law, administrative law, case law, constitutional law, or otherwise.  The information on this website does not constitute legal advice and readers should not rely on it to solve problems or other matters.  Further, you should seek licensed counsel in the appropriate legal jurisdiction before taking any action.  Any information provided on this site is presented “As Is” for your personal curiosity and enjoyment.  It is not meant to be relied upon for legal advice, counsel, or for any other purposes.  Such information does not take the place of a lawyer.  Rules and laws differ by jurisdiction and the information contained within this website may not apply in your jurisdiction.  The appearance of articles, listings, or ads, by or for professionals, on this site, does not constitute an endorsement.  In all cases, you are responsible for determining the quality of services, information, and/or advice provided by professionals through, or as a consequence of, your use of this site.  Neither liability nor responsibility shall arise to any person or entity with respect to loss or damage caused (or alleged to be caused), directly or indirectly, by information posted on this website, or by reason of contact with a professional listed on, or posting information to, this site.  No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this website and practice is limited to jurisdiction where lawyers are admitted.  The information furnished on the website is only general and not a substitute for personalized legal advice.   Legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to the individual(s) situation.  Laws can change daily and new laws may, and likely will, affect the accuracy of the information herein.  The information herein may be outdated and replaced by new law.

If you are seeking representation, please read the following notice before sending an e-mail:

Sending an e-mail will not make you a client.  Until an agreement regarding representation is reached with you, anything you send will not be confidential or privileged.  Before representation can occur, a lawyer will first take you through the conflict of interest procedure and see that you are put in touch with the lawyer best suited to handle your matter.

If you proceed with an e-mail, you confirm that you have read and understood this notice.


About Matthew McKinney

Attorney focused on civil and commercial litigation.
This entry was posted in Business Owner, Director, Intra-corporate dispute, Litigation, Manager, Member, Officer and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Iowa Limited Liability Companies – Iowa’s Statutory Limitation on Piercing the Corporate Veil of an Iowa LLC

  1. Pingback: Holding A Corporation’s Owners Personally Liable – Piercing the Corporate Veil in an Iowa Corporation | Business and Corporate Disputes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s